Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8698 14
Original file (NR8698 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HD
Docket No. NR8698-14

76 Mareh 7015

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To; Secretary of the Navy

subj:
VIEW OF

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C, 1552

Enel: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 28 Mar 14 w/attachments
(2) HOMC MIQ memo dtd 9 Feb 15 -

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative
Remarks (1070)") entry dated 3 January 2014. A copy of the contested
entry is ac Tab A.

 

rh

whe Bozzé, consisting o2 ——_ es
eviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
6 March 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated. below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

1

pom

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under exist ing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence at enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine
Corps office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s
case has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error and injustice warranting the following corrective action:

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the. —

service record page 11 ("Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated |
3 January 2014. This is to be accomplished by physically removing
the page 11 on which the entry appears, or completely obliterating
the entry so it cannot be read, rather than merely lining through
it.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e)} and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the

foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
(a) has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4525 13

    Original file (NR4525 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 9 September 2011, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7811 14

    Original file (NR7811 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to 4s Petitioner, filed epclosure (1) with this Boaré requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page ll (“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entry dated 26 March 2014 lcopy at Tab A). That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0955 14

    Original file (NR0955 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (‘Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 1 March 2010, a copy of which is at Tab A. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 1 March 2010. Pursuant to the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4610 14

    Original file (NR4610 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 29 June and 19 July 2011, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Genteman and Spain, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 17 April 2014, and pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8392 14

    Original file (NR8392 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (‘Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 16 May 2014. The Board, having reviewed al ry and injustice, finds as follows: to Petitioner's allegations of erro a, Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2410 14

    Original file (NR2410 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), ‘Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 23 February 2011 and his rebuttal of the same date, copies of which are at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Genteman, Iving and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1’ July...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3835 14

    Original file (NR3835 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable navat record be corrected by removing the service record page il (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry Gated 6 November 2012 (copy at Tab A). he Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3743-13

    Original file (NR3743-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Finally, by implication, he also requested removing the page 11 entry dated 3 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Gorenflo and Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0847 14

    Original file (NR0847 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the undated service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry concerning counseling for dereliction in the performance of duties, specifically, failing to return his pistol to the armory, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7865 14

    Original file (NR7865 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMEW?T OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7015. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred tc as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070}") entries dated 15 October 2013 {copy at Tab A) and 8 April 2014 (copy at Tab B). The Board, consisting of Ms. Polk and Messrs. Exnicios and Grover, reviewed...